Chrome proves to be the fastest browser, but is it the best?

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 55   +2
Staff
What just happened? The first attribute most people want in a browser is speed – waiting even three or four extra seconds for a page to load can seem an eternity in internet time. If that is the only thing important to you, then look no further than Chrome, which beat five other browsers in tests for web page rendering, JavaScript and graphics. But there are other considerations, too, starting with Chrome's habit of collecting a voracious amount of user data.

How fast a web page loads depends on many factors, starting, of course, with your broadband speed. But the browser you are using can have a significant impact as well, as PCWorld set out to prove.

Browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, or Safari will perform differently when interpreting HTML, executing scripts, or loading graphics and videos, contributor Steffen Zellfelder pointed out. To find out which browser performed best at these tasks, the publication tested them on a mid-range system that featured an AMD Ryzen 5 3600 CPU, Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti graphics, 16 GB of DDR4-3200 memory, and a Samsung 970 Evo SSD. For the operating system, it opted for Windows 10 version 22H2.

Zellfelder put Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Microsoft Edge, Brave, and Vivaldi through their paces using three benchmark tools: Speedometer 3.0, Jetstream2 and Motionmark 1.3.

Speedometer tests web page rendering. Jetstream is more focused on assembly and JavaScript. To perform well in this test, browsers must start quickly and not waste time executing code. Motionmark tests in-browser graphics, which means the browsers have to fulfill complex tasks and achieve a certain frame rate in complex animations.

The bottom line is that Chrome came first in Speedometer and second in the other two benchmarks by a very thin margin. PCWorld dubbed Google's browser the clear winner – especially as it was only a few points short of taking first place three times.

But there are other considerations when selecting a browser. As PCWorld noted, Google's business model is based on data processing and Chrome collects a disproportionate amount of user data. Meanwhile, Firefox, which came in last place for Jetstream and the graphics benchmark, makes data protection a priority.

Security is also an important factor to most users who want to see robust features and frequent updates to protect against threats. In this case, Brave has been ranked as one of the most secure browsers available.

Also, if you use multiple devices, a browser that can sync bookmarks, passwords, and browsing history across platforms would be important to you. Here, Chrome is a leading candidate as it has built-in sync functionality that is easy to turn on.

And while the average web surfer may not be interested in this, market share can be important too, as the more popular browsers often have better support and compatibility with websites.

Permalink to story:

 
I wanted to keep Edge for Copilot use but Edge didnt free the memory it was taking after closing so I got rid of Edge and now I m using Chrome . The only thing I didnt try was clean Windows install but it was a hassle I wanted to avoid .
 
Firefox and Brave are no saints when it comes to privacy. They each have their controversies. The primary thing that makes them 'safer' than other browsers is their low market share.

If they want to make money, and they do, they'll need your data. It's easy to boast about being privacy focused when you're the guppy in a big pond of data hoarders. That's my take anyway.
 
Firefox and Brave are no saints when it comes to privacy. They each have their controversies. The primary thing that makes them 'safer' than other browsers is their low market share.

If they want to make money, and they do, they'll need your data. It's easy to boast about being privacy focused when you're the guppy in a big pond of data hoarders. That's my take anyway.



I’d still say M$ and Google are 20 times worse though. That’s all the reason I need to steer clear of Chrome and Edge unless there is no other choice.
 
Moved back to Firefox recently after a 12 year hiatus and I gotta say, quite like it, don’t see me going back to Edge or Chrome for the foreseeable future.

Speed tests don’t seem to mean anything, Firefox felt quicker than Edge or Chrome to me, maybe the way Add-ons and Plugins work differently on Firefox, who knows.
 
If you put the fastest and slowest in front of someone in a blind test, they probably wouldn't tell the difference between browsers these days. All popular browsers are fast, some are just a bit faster than others. Try to support a future internet that isn't controlled by an advertising company's browser. Firefox is a competent and performant browser. Give it an honest go and find out for yourself.
 
Will use FF but not surprised it's the slowest. Mozilla makes multiple announcements a year about how the latest FF is the fastest ever, but it always comes dead last.
 
How can spyware be "the best"? It's an oxymoron.

And saying that "Firefox is no saint" and putting it in the same league as Google is silly. All they do re data is some non-tradeable telemetry for developement purposes. Their only privacy problem is in fact Google related - the fact they still set them as search engine default, and perhaps use that dubious Safe Browsing thing. And that they are entirely funded by Google too.

These things should change, but still are incomparable to what the world's biggest data leech is doing.
 
Why do people care about something we don't have in world. Privacy died long ago, if it ever truly existed in the first place. Even if it did, the world was different.

There is no place you can go that you truly couldn't be found. At least not from governments. Maybe from faimly n friends but not from someone who knows how to look.
Governments do what they want, when they want. That will never change. They monitor so much and will continue to do so, all in the name of national security.

Privacy as we know it is a pipe dream.
 
Privacy as we know it is a pipe dream.
That is a self-perpetuating myth. Example? This discussion.

You, nor ANYONE else watching this, has any clue who I am.
Techspot has no clue who I am.
My email provider has no clue who I am.
My ISP doesn't even know who I am.

Anyone who thinks Privacy is "Pipe Dream" is someone who either needs to stop wearing tin-hats or someone who is ignorant to reality and a fool to themselves. (Nothing personal)

Stop giving into that nonsense, protect yourself and learn how to effectively safeguard your privacy.
 
Last edited:
ZedRM , dont be so naive . They collect data not without a reason . Reason beyond marketing . But I m used to it . Ultimately I m not a criminal , so I sholud not fear .
 
Why would anyone use Google? Why, would anyone promote (TechSpot & others) Google as a valued company? That was dumb question, of course money is the reason. They (China-Google) are the most corrupt business entity on the planet, save Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Apple... Google is NOT your friend. They sell your personal information for big $$$. They are in lawsuits all over the world, for their illegal practices!

I'm always suspect of a business, that would sell anything China-Google... Good to know where TechSpot stands on this.
 
That is a self-perpetuating myth. Example? This discussion.

You, nor ANYONE else watching this, has any clue who I am.
Techspot has no clue who I am.
My email provider has no clue who I am.
My ISP doesn't even know who I am.
Inexcusably naive, to say the least. Techspot has your IP. Your ISP has that and your MAC address, which correlates to a physical location and a physical device -- and, via your DNS history, a list of all sites you've visited. Google tracks every search you've ever done, which -- even without your IP or MAC address -- is almost always sufficient to personally identify you. And even privacy-oriented search engines like DuckDuckGo have been found to be sharing private search history with providers like Microsoft.
 
Inexcusably naive, to say the least. Techspot has your IP. Your ISP has that and your MAC address, which correlates to a physical location and a physical device -- and, via your DNS history, a list of all sites you've visited. Google tracks every search you've ever done, which -- even without your IP or MAC address -- is almost always sufficient to personally identify you. And even privacy-oriented search engines like DuckDuckGo have been found to be sharing private search history with providers like Microsoft.
My ISP, TechSpot, nor does any other URL have my IP. They all have an IP address, but it's not my true IP.
 
My ISP, TechSpot, nor does any other URL have my IP. They all have an IP address, but it's not my true IP.
If you believe your ISP doesn't have your IP address, then you're incredibly misinformed at how VPN works. And while that might stop Techspot from obtaining your true IP, it certainly won't prevent most state-level actors.
 
Inexcusably naive, to say the least. Techspot has your IP. Your ISP has that and your MAC address, which correlates to a physical location and a physical device -- and, via your DNS history, a list of all sites you've visited. Google tracks every search you've ever done, which -- even without your IP or MAC address -- is almost always sufficient to personally identify you. And even privacy-oriented search engines like DuckDuckGo have been found to be sharing private search history with providers like Microsoft.
I mean, who’s using their ISP DNS servers? They’re usually rubbish vs Cloudflares or Quad 9’s or something else.

I have DNS-over-TLS switched on at a router level and enforced for all devices, so as far as I’m aware, my ISP can’t intercept my DNS to figure any of that out.

So all the information my ISP has on me is my dynamic IP which they set, and the MAC address of the router? A lot of devices mask their MAC addresses these days, so they don’t even see the real MAC address.
 
Back