Users challenge distracting Google Maps pop-up ads that suggest "quick detours"

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,246   +1,458
Staff member
The good old days: When I was a young whipper-snapper driving off into unfamiliar territory, I had to buy a paper map. Yes, maps used to be printed on large sheets of folded paper that you could never refold. I would plan out my route in advance, and turn-by-turn directions were obtained by memorizing a list or by my navigator (aka wife, friend, brother) reading from my notes. Then, the internet ruined everything.

Android user Anthony Higman recently noticed something during a trip with Google Maps navigation running. He posted on X that as he was driving by a gas station, an ad for a convenience store called Royal Farms popped up on the screen, offering to add the location as a stop on the route. He had never seen such a popup before, and as a self-proclaimed advertising aficionado, he wondered "what kind of ad format" it was.

Another user responded to his post with a screenshot of a similar ad for the Mustang Ranch brothel in Nevada.

"Imagined headline: Multi-car pile up in Sparks, NV due to distracted drivers," he quipped.

Higman agreed that the ad was indeed "super distracting."

Both screenshots showed that the businesses displayed were "sponsored" advertisers with their review ratings shown. The Maps app described the locations as a "Quick detour." Since Higman had never noticed the Maps app do that before he assumed that Google was testing a new ad placement idea, albeit an ill-conceived one.

Surprisingly, the popup distractions are not new. A Google "Ads Liaison" responded to his post, saying that the feature, referred to as "promoted pins," has been around for a while. They show up as drivers draw near or pass businesses along the Maps route.

"To avoid driver distraction, these ads do not pop up, expand only if they're tapped on, and disappear quickly after a short time," the Ads rep said.

However, Higman pointed out that he did not interact with the screen and that the popup displayed for 45 seconds to a minute. The representative admitted that that was not normal behavior and would follow up with a private message for details she could pass on to the Ads team.

Another poster translated the Google speak for Higman:" 'not expected behavior' oops – we got caught a/b testing our abortion of an idea."

Promoted pins might be a great idea on paper, and they undoubtedly have added to Google's advertising coffers, but at what expense?

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, distracted driving is the number one cause of US traffic accidents. The American Automobile Association concurs, noting that distracted drivers cause 25 to 50 percent of automobile accidents.

Permalink to story:

 
I'll be the guy that calls out whether your eyes were on the ad or the map... they weren't on the road, so in that moment, he was distracted and likely to cause an accident regardless of the part of the screen he was looking at... point taken about the NEW thing being more distracting for longer.
 
I only use maps when I am out in the county so I don't end up in Felch. They have a necessary purpose and if I was going somewhere on the 1000 mph interstate I would not want an ad making something more difficult. People that buy ads are so Herb Tarlicked
 
Google continues to load up any of their applications with ads and distractions, none of which are helpful to the end user. With their monopoly they need to be broken up just like Standard Oil was, but into much smaller pieces and prevented from gathering the pieces together again.
 
Back when I still did not have a GPU, I would actually know the area.
I would have a general idea of direction and where to go.
But those times have passed.
The only thing that annoys me though, is when gmaps suddenly throws in an improved route which I haven't used before. One of those routs where you have to pick lanes in advance or be at the mercy of other drivers who would let you in in their lane or not.
 
In my car I have a real Garmin GPS, that is far better. Google is ok for a quick and dirty local trips especially by foot. Google rarely ever displays speed limit, doesn't show red-lights, doesn't do zoom-in 3D when approaching complex intersections, doesn't show fixed speed cameras, suggests routes that are impossible or ludicrous such as trying to turn right at a left turn only street or across an 8 lane highway without traffic lights.
 
Dumb idea.

Reading a paper map (and being able to figure out where you are on one after driving in any direction you feel for 6 hours before stopping and realizing you're in the middle of nowhere in another state....ahh...the days of youth) is a lost art.

Relevant to paper maps and being old...
 
Yet another reason for me to prefer the OEM navigation in a car to using a phone. I've tried out android auto and CarPlay but I still generally prefer to use what came with the car. OEM navigation more seamlessly integrates with the car's physical/voice/gesture controls and isn't potentially dependent on a bluetooth connection happening (or not, as it occasionally decides not to connect). In our 2 most recent cars, navigation directions are also shown in the HUD and on the dashboard, something the phone can't do.

The only time I yank out a phone for mapping is if the internal navigation is too out of date to get there, such as in my son's 19 year old Acura with it's glorious 2D map.
 
Back