The EU targets X with potential massive fines for deceptive verification practices

midian182

Posts: 9,953   +128
Staff member
What just happened? Elon Musk's X platform is once again in trouble in Europe. The European Union Commission says that the platform is a hotbed of misinformation and illegal content, its transparency and accountability requirements are inadequate, and the blue tick verification system is deceptive. As such, the service could face a fine reaching into the millions of dollars.

Last year, the EU Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, began investigating whether X was breaching the Digital Services Act (DSA). The preliminary findings have just been released, and it won't please Musk.

X has been formally charged for failing to respect EU social media law. One of the main objections was against the blue checkmarks that give anyone a "verified account" if they're willing to pay. Before Musk made verification a paid-for feature, only those in the public eye, such as celebrities and politicians, were able to be verified.

The commission noted that the ability to purchase verification deviates from industry practices and cited evidence of "motivated malicious actors" abusing the system to deceive users. There have been cases of people using the checkmarks to impersonate celebrities and companies. Pharmaceutical manufacturer Eli Lilly's share price sank 4% when someone pretending to be the company posted a message claiming it was making insulin free to everyone.

"Back in the day, BlueChecks used to mean trustworthy sources of information," European Commissioner Thierry Breton said in a statement. "Now with X, our preliminary view is that they deceive users and infringe the DSA."

X has also been charged with failing to comply with requirements related to ad transparency. DSA rules state that platforms must publish a database of all digital advertisements that they've carried, along with details that include who paid for them and their intended audience. The commission writes that X's ad database has "design features and access barriers" that make it "unfit for its transparency purpose."

The Commission said X also limits access to its public data to researchers, which is required by the DSA. The agency will continue to investigate if X broke rules related to the spread of illegal content and took sufficient measures to limit disinformation.

If the Commission's views are confirmed, X could face a fine of up to 6% of its global annual turnover.

Back in September, the European Union identified X as the social media platform with the highest ratio of misinformation/disinformation posts.

Permalink to story:

 
Oh great, can't wait for man-child Musk to throw his usual tantrum and trash talk the EU with random nonsense accusations.
 
How dare they threaten to fine The God of Mars for propagating Martian BS. Ack, ack, ack, ack, ack, ack.
/s
Actually, they first demanded that X -- like many other social media firms in the EU -- give them a backdoor into the system to monitor and search all posts, along with an API to allow the EU to quietly censor any they deemed unacceptable. Musk refused this totalitarian demand, and so they sued.
 
Actually, they first demanded that X -- like many other social media firms in the EU -- give them a backdoor into the system to monitor and search all posts, along with an API to allow the EU to quietly censor any they deemed unacceptable. Musk refused this totalitarian demand, and so they sued.
They should do like India's government instead, since he definitely didn't seem as bothered by those demands. Transparency reports got canned as well in that era, which used to disclose a lot of those takedowns requests. Talks a good game when it's convenient but kneels when heads are turned
 
They should do like India's government instead, since he definitely didn't seem as bothered by those demands. Transparency reports got canned as well in that era, which used to disclose a lot of those takedowns requests. Talks a good game when it's convenient but kneels when heads are turned
Oops! Your facts are in serious error:

Aug 2023: "Musk's X challenges India ruling on content blocking, cites censorship risk...

...NEW DELHI, (Reuters) - Social media platform X is seeking to quash an Indian court ruling that it was not compliant with federal government orders to remove content, arguing it could embolden New Delhi to block more content and broaden the scope for censorship...."

Then there's this from the Indian Press:

Feb 2024, " X disagrees with censorship orders, calls for greater transparency
...The Indian Express has learnt that a majority of the accounts the Indian government asked X to block were tweeting in support of the ongoing farmers’ protests....This marks a new flashpoint in the escalating tensions between the social media platform and the Indian government...."

https://indianexpress.com/article/india/farmers-protest-x-twitter-accounts-block-9174547/
 
Last edited:
EU is angry that "Verification" works and that they can no longer game the system with fake accounts, or VIP accounts. One account per-person verified with CC#.

If you read through this, EU Overlord Politicians do NOT want want "Verified" Accounts to stand, because these Progressive Socialist don't like getting ratio (in real time), without SJW bot-farms backing their post w/Soros algorithms.


This Targeting by the EU politicians is BECAUSE they can't control mass messaging on Twitter/X & can't command bot-farmz any longer.

There is no Deception in "Verified Accounts".
It means this person is real human with a CC and has ONE ACCOUNT. (ie: they are not a 18 year old with 5 bot accounts... spewing SJW redirect.)
 
Back